In my experience with the land registry records, they don't record whether or not a property has been rebuilt as they focus on the plot information (sales, leases, incumbrances etc).
The 1967 date does imply that is the (re)build year though. There may be an entry on the records for that year that might help you infer what happened though...
Comments
Interesting
How interesting. It would appear to be the original building but the date on it is 1967.
Re: Maybe a rebuilt
Hi there,
To verify one has to go to the lands office, pay a small fee to look up the records.
I remember one house at Mount Cameron had been rebuilt using the original blueprints that even fooled the officials.
T
rebuild
In my experience with the land registry records, they don't record whether or not a property has been rebuilt as they focus on the plot information (sales, leases, incumbrances etc).
The 1967 date does imply that is the (re)build year though. There may be an entry on the records for that year that might help you infer what happened though...