Dorothy Dransfield 3

The photo is not flipped. 

Reason being I highlighted the previous sloping right shoulder and more level left shoulder which is present in this photo. I suspected an underlying idiopathic scoliosis. 

One interesting thing is I think I now know why the previous photos showed a closed thin lipped smile - I can see her teeth here and she has a skeletal class 2 malocclusion. The upper jaw is more developed relative to the lower jaw (maxillary prognathism) or the lower jaw less developed relative to the upper jaw (mandibular retrognathism) or a combination of both. The result is overcrowding of the teeth in the upper jaw and protrusion. Class II skeletal malocclusion and scoliosis are two distinct conditions that can sometimes be related. Studies suggest a possible association between certain types of scoliosis and specific malocclusions, particularly Class II malocclusion with a tendency towards midline deviations and lateral crossbites. 

Anyway....back to the identity of the location. At least you know for a certainty it's the right way round! 
 

The other thing worth noting is she appears to have a simple goitre. This may be an euthyroid or simple non-toxic goitre, that is the thyroid gland is enlarged but there is no evidence of thyroid dysfunction. She does not look particularly hypo- or hyperthyroid. The goitre may be idiopathic (unknown) or due to iodine deficiency. I assume she grew up in Hong Kong and iodised salt would not have been present a hundred years ago in Hong Kong. Despite its costal location (foods rich in iodine like seaweed, molluscs, fish etc), a study 100 years forwards in time from when the above photo was taken show that there is an overall iodine deficiency in both sexes in the HK population. 

The architecture of the building is similar to this building in Hart Avenue. This may suggest the photo was taken in the area of Tsim Sha Tsui/Jordan. This is indirectly supported by the fact she spent some of her schooling at Central British School on Nathan Road, so this is probably a teenage Dorothy. 

This makes me think - if the facade of the building in the background is such, then Dorothy is standing just inside the sandy driveway of a property, and the main road is running perpendicular to Dorothy's right side. 

So…whose property is that? Or is that public property and that was the destination for that day's events? 

Yes, the driveway actually rises slightly from the pavement/main road and it's not level. The driveway is wide enough to not have a gate. Able to fit a car. 

The shadows are long. And if there is significant sunlight bathing Dorothy it means there is no building or trees of significant height behind the photographer or Dorothy would be in shadow or we would see shadows in the foreground and there is none. So is the property in question at a crossroads for example? 

Abundant foliage and cascade of mature dark green leaves. Cool enough to have a long-sleeved Dorothy. Late summer/autumn? - are we looking at a September/October date? Any special events in the Warren/Olson calendar around then in the late 1920s?