1915 Hong Kong Cricket Club Tennis Match

Mon, 03/28/2016 - 12:10

Just over a century ago. Played on 31 May 1915 between H. E. Nisbet (ex-champion) and S. H. Green (Colony's defending champion) at the Hong Kong Cricket Club. Nisbet won 0-6, 9-7, 6-2, 5-7 and 6-4. China Mail 1 June 1915 refers. The papers of the day refer the name of the victor as Nisbet which is different from the spelling in the photograph.

 

Date picture taken
31 May 1915
Tags
Author(s)

Comments

OK, I found the China Mail article, thanks.  According to records from the tennis association, H.A. Nisbet and S.E. Green met in the final of the Hong Kong Grass Court Championships held at the Cricket Club twice, won by Nisbet in 1914 and by Green in 1917.  Also, Green won the tournament in 1915.  So, if Nisbet beat Green in May 1915, then it couldn't have been during the Hong Kong Grass Court Championships.  It could have been an exhibition match, but the article didn't give the actual name of the event.  The China Mail reporter must have gotten their initials wrong because when talking about ex-champions and defending champions, it couldn't have been anyone else other than H.A. Nisbet and S.E. Green.  The photo is incredible though where was it found?

Like many photos of the time, I think this particular photo is from a photographic studio that covered the duel beteeen the two champions. Hence, the photographic number at bottom right. The quick research at the time the scanned photo was posted was that it was an 'exhibition match'. That said, the other English newspapers like the Hong Kong Telegraph or the Hong Kong Daily Press of the same time-frame may be able to provide a better explanation of the origin of the match.  

i am not able to access this particular photo at the present time.

Viewed the Hong Kong Daily Press dated 1 June 1915. The contest (not a final) was to determine unofficially the "men's tennis champion" of Hong Kong. Proceeds of the match were devoted to the Prince of Wales' Fund.

As for the photo, one may have to refer to auction sites or wait for listings from sellers.

It's interesting how the Daily Press article is worded.  Like you pointed out, it was labelled a "contest" and not a final. Yet, it did not mention the victor's next opponent. So, it could perhaps be a one-off exhibition.  The article also did not mention the name of the contest, which is very unusual in sports.  However, it said: "At times Green played so forcefully and well and...everyone must’ve thought that we should have to hail a brand new champion".  The thought of a "brand new champion" surely implied that it was a final of some sort.