Capital of the crown colony / dependent territory

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 06/11/2011 - 19:24

What's the capital of the crown colony (dependent territory from the early 1980s onwards with the passage of the new act)? How were capitals defined in British colonies?

Very often the capital of the crown colony / dependent territories of HK is said to be the City of Victoria. And yet there's basically no statutory basis for that. In what way is the capitals of crown colonies / dependent territories determined? Is it a must to define and entrench the status of capitals in statutes?

According to Eitel in Europe in China (p.188), Victoria was officially announced as the city's name in the same document that proclaimed the ratification of the Treaty Of Nanking, on June 26, 1843. It was published in the Government Gazette on June 29, 1843.

Submitted by
Anonymous (not verified)
on
Sun, 06/26/2011 - 01:52

In reply to by Adam

Would Eitel's book or the gazette be available on the net or in any library? Is it HK's gazette or the London Gazette? And is that declaration / announcement still valid beyond 1st July 1997?

I think we need to define "capital".

The concept of a "capital" is political.  It does not exist Hong Kong because we are just a large city, even though we are called a "special administrative region".  There are no independent government administrative areas.  The "District Councils" are advisory only, they have no legal decision making ability - and most importantly, cannot independently tax their population.

We only have neighbourhoods, really.  It is like asking what is the "capital" of New York City, or Manchester, or Berlin.

There is a single government entity, and they have departments responsible for the different neighbourhoods.

HK is very similar to say Singapore or Aden in that the city itself pretty much made up of the entire colony. Perhaps it has to do with the small size of the colony that rendered a so called capital unnecessary.

If you look at this list of books from the 1940's, they all say that the city of Victoria was the capital of the colony of Hong Kong.

We've got more about the City of Victoria in terms of it's area. It would be worth checking the definitions of the area to see if they mantion capital status at all.

Size doesn't seem to matter. According to the BBC's profile of Gibraltar, it still has a defined capital: 'Gibraltar town'.

Please let us know if you find out how capitals are defined.

Regards, David

There are quite a lot of dependencies or dependent territories that are smaller than HK in terms of size, and are unitary in nature, i.e., not having any administrative units.., or like HK, where the local councils are merely advisory in nature, without any governance capacity. Yet all these territories are having capitals.

And if one compares HK with many European cities, one would agree it  is several cities and towns forming a conurbation. It isn't one city per se. Victoria City is one city, with urban sprawl along the northern shore of the island and beyond its statutory border. Kowloon and New Kowloon is another city. Sha Tin, Castle Peak (Tuen Mun) and Tsuen Wan are also cities (or very very big towns), whereas towns include Tai O, Stanley, Sai Kung, Silvermine Bay, Cheung Chau, etc.

Even microstates are having capitals, e.g., Tuvalu, Malta, Liechtenstein, Andorra, San Marino, Luxembourg, etc.

 

HK is geographically a collection of several cities and towns, although administratively it got one single tier of government. It's simply perculiar to call it one single city according to European or even Japanese or Taiwanese standard... (or Canadian standard before all those stupid amalgamations took place).

I don't know much about Aden.., but for Singapore, there was indeed a City of Singapore, with its own city council and charter, before Lee Kuan Yew became the PM and led the colony towards independence. It covered only a portion of the crown colony of Singapore.